Tea Cup & Nuts
written
and translated by: Nour Maarawi
edited by: Adam Domari
It was a fairly
hot night. I was sitting in front of my PC alone, thinking about what I was going
to write for the magazine's next issue. Along with many chaotic, random
thoughts, I drifted away to a realm of imagination where I found myself in a
better world; a world where humans are created to be humans. Where their
humanity is not a commodity sold at a marketplace that displays normal behavior
behind bars of prejudice and discrimination.
The phone's
ringing, which sounded more like moaning, brought me back to reality. I picked
up and it was one of my friends inviting me over to his apartment. He had
already invited two other friends of ours who had finished their pack of
cigarettes. I heard them in the background telling him: "tell him to bring
a pack of cigarettes with him".
I was
hesitant at first. It was already dark outside and the situation wasn't very
stable at the time. But then I said to myself "why not? Que sera
sera". I called a cab because my friend's house was far away from mine. I
arrived to his building and he welcomed me by opening the building's door. I
went up the stairs and he opened a second then a third. We finally arrived to
his apartment and he opened the door for me; that was the fourth door. I wasn't
surprised, it was very normal considering the situation.
Smiles were
the first thing I noticed, and then kisses on the cheeks. Ironically, after all
the reinforcements and doors, we sat on the balcony. As usual, I found my first
friend in his underwear slamming his belly and showing it off while eating what
was left of the plate of fruits. The other one was looking at him with resentment
and fear, because the first used to punch him for fun like he was doing with
his belly. I sat down and before I caught my breath, I took the pack of
cigarettes out of my bag and gave it to them. I saw the light and happiness of
their yellowish teeth thanking me for what I had brought.
The pack was
opened and the cigarettes were handed out, I didn't take one because I had quit
smoking a long time ago. The conversation started along with the smoking. We
talked about the situation and politics. We played the roles of political
analysts, as if we were aware of all political schemes. Then we became medical
experts. One of my friends was studying pharmacy but he always gets upset if
you ask him a medical question so we quickly changed the subject. We then turned
into religious scholars and started a pointless discussion. My friend with the
belly was the leader of this conversation as he was the closest one of us to a
religious man, although he wasn't exactly one. Just like the other conversations
ended, so did this one.
With sounds
of bullets from light weapons, followed by medium and heavy weaponry which were
then followed by their big sister, the mortar; we rushed inside to the living
room where the evening took a different taste especially after the tea and the
snacks had arrived.
When the pot
of boiling tea arrived with vapor rushing out of it, it brought with it all
kinds of foggy topics. We talked about politics again, followed by human rights
and then our emotions and feelings – the last was always brought up by my
friends for mockery. I don't know why but I had a weird feeling when I looked at
my third friend, who was studying philosophy. He had a strange grin on his
face; as if he was saying "I'm going to start a conversation that will
change the atmosphere". Of course I thought to myself: "he's going to
talk about homosexuality". And I was right; he always opens it for many reasons,
I only know some of. Smiles started growing bigger until they became laughter
with the pharmacist; but stayed a wide yellow grin with the other two. Homosexuality
always brought sexual thoughts to their minds, regardless of the reason of the
discussion and where it was going.
After
starting the conversation, he cleared the field for our religious friend who
didn't hesitate to start saying what he was taught about the "abnormality
of the act" without even thinking that he should give a reasonable or
logical explanation. Instead he just kept going on and on about how normal vaginal
sex was and how anal sex was a disgusting unnatural act. He didn't dare to say
"not even animals do it" because I had convinced him a while ago that
homosexuality is widespread in the animal kingdom.
But this
time he came up with a different explanation. He suggested an animal's sexual
behavior was not an innate behavior but it developed as it happened with
humans. All of that of course without stating any piece of scientific evidence
to back his theory.
I tried to
ignore him as much as possible. Even if I had something to say, his words were
wrong on every scientific level; psychologically, biologically and medically. I
wanted to know what their biggest reason for rejecting gay relationships was so
I asked them one by one and all three had the same answer.
They all
said that they accepted homosexuality and realized it was a normal social phenomenon.
Their rejection was based on the idea of the sexual relation. "How can a
man have sex with another man?!" they said with disgust and disdain
visible on their faces.
I
immediately realized what the reason for their disgust was. They were imaging
themselves having sex with another guy, which instantly triggered their
paranoia about their masculinity. They're not what can be considered homophobic
as they had declared clearly that they would have sex with another guy,
provided they were the active partner. Their fear came from imagining
themselves in the passive partner's position.
Another
interesting point they made was that they had no problem with having anal sex
with a girl – a lot of guys do that in Middle Eastern societies to preserve the
girl's virginity. This indicated that they had a problem with the gender of
their partner, not the "abnormality" of the act. This is perfectly
understandable considering they were heterosexuals but it was wrong to use it
as an argument against homosexuality.
One of them
then suggested a more "modern" approach to the subject. He stated
that homosexuals were mentally ill people who needed our help and acceptance to
get better. Of course this is also rejected by most scientific evidence dating
as far back as the days of Sigmund Froid.
Finally, I
sadly have to say that most people, even psychiatrists, in the Middle Ease
still hold on to negative thoughts and prejudices against homosexuality, as do
some Western societies as well. However, scientific evidence is increasingly denying
the theory that homosexuality is a mental
illness or related to psychological disorders in any way.
Written for Mawaleh the fist Syrian LGBTQ magazine, read here.